Post-Training Evaluation: Maximizing the Impact of Employee Development

Employee training in any organisation, is an essential investment aimed at enhancing skills, improving productivity, and driving business goals forward. However, the true value of training programmes isn’t realised by simply conducting sessions; it is found in how effectively these programmes impact performance and achiprovement, and ensures a return on investment (ROI) in employee development.

This article explores the importance of post-training evaluation, key methods for conducting it, and provides examples to illustrate how organizations can successfully leverage post-training evaluation to maximise the impact of their training initiatives.

Understanding the Importance of Post-Training Evaluation

Post-training evaluation goes beyond attendance records and satisfaction surveys; it provides a systematic approach to measuring whether a training programme has achieved its intended outcomes. This is vital because, without evaluating the results, organisations can’t determine if the time, resources, and funds allocated and expended on the training have been worthwhile. Effective post-training evaluation can offer insights into:

1. Skills Transfer: Whether employees are applying new knowledge and skills to their roles.
2. Behavioural Changes: How training has influenced employee behaviours and interactions.
3. Impact on Performance: How the skills learned contribute to improved job performance and productivity.
4. Cost-Benefit Analysis: Whether the benefits of the training outweigh its costs.

For example, in a fast-paced industry like retail, employees often receive customer service training to enhance customer interactions. By evaluating post-training, retail companies can measure whether customer satisfaction scores have improved, ensuring that the training had a tangible impact.

Key Methods of Post-Training Evaluation

There are several methods for evaluating training effectiveness, and choosing the right approach often depends on the organisation’s goals and available resources. The following are some widely used methods:

1. Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Evaluation Model
   1. Level 1: Reaction – Measures participant satisfaction with the training.
   1. Level 2: Learning – Assesses how much participants learned or retained.
   1. Level 3: Behaviour – Observes whether employees are applying their skills on the job.
   1. Level 4: Results – Examines the impact on overall business outcomes.

For instance, a bank in Lagos providing training on digital tools for its customer service team might use Kirkpatrick’s model. Initially, the bank could measure participants’ reactions and learning retention. Six months later, managers could assess if team members are efficiently using these tools to serve clients, and finally, evaluate whether these efforts have improved customer satisfaction scores.

• The Phillips ROI Model
  • This model extends Kirkpatrick’s, adding a fifth level to measure ROI by comparing training costs with the financial benefits gained.

AT&T in the U.S., good example of a company that frequently invests in technical training for its workforce to keep pace with technological changes. Using the Phillips ROI model, AT&T calculates the training’s financial impact, like increased efficiency or reduced errors, demonstrating a clear ROI for its programs.

• Pre- and Post-Training Assessments
  • This method involves testing employees’ knowledge or skills before and after training to measure improvement.

A local manufacturing company might use this approach to evaluate safety training, assessing employee understanding of safety protocols before and after the training. By comparing pre- and post-assessment results, the company can gauge the knowledge gained and adjust future sessions accordingly.

• Self-Assessments and 360-Degree Feedback
  • Self-assessments allow employees to reflect on how they have applied the training in their roles. Meanwhile, 360-degree feedback involves gathering input from colleagues, supervisors, and subordinates, providing a well-rounded view of the employee’s progress.

For instance, in a tech startup environment, where collaborative work is common, 360-degree feedback after a team-building training session can reveal whether employees are communicating and collaborating more effectively.

• Observation and Performance Monitoring
  • Observing employees in their day-to-day tasks after training can offer direct insight into how well they apply new skills. Performance metrics can also be monitored over time to see if improvements align with training objectives.

For example, a Nigerian hospital training its staff in the use of electronic health records (EHR). Observing employees in the months following the training would help assess whether they are confidently and correctly using the system, enhancing both efficiency and patient care.

Challenges in Post-Training Evaluation

While post-training evaluation is crucial, it comes with its own set of challenges. Common hurdles include:

• Resource Constraints: Comprehensive evaluations can require significant time and financial resources, which may be limited in smaller organisations.
• Measurement Complexity: Gauging behavioural change or ROI from training isn’t always straightforward.
• Employee Buy-In: Employees may feel pressured or resistant to assessments, making it challenging to get honest feedback.

Despite these challenges, the benefits of post-training evaluation surpasses the difficulties, as it helps ensure that training efforts yield results aligned with organisational goals.

Best Practices for Effective Post-Training Evaluation

To maximize the impact of post-training evaluation, organisations should consider the following best practices:

1. Set Clear Objectives: Before training begins, define what success looks like. Clear objectives guide the evaluation process and provide benchmarks for measuring effectiveness.
2. Use Multiple Evaluation Methods: Combining qualitative and quantitative methods provides a fuller picture of training outcomes.
3. Gather Feedback from Multiple Sources: Gathering input from various stakeholders offers a balanced view of the training’s impact and helps identify areas for improvement.
4. Evaluate Over Time: The immediate effects of training may not always reflect long-term impact. A continuous evaluation schedule allows for more accurate assessments of training effectiveness.

Conclusion

Post-training evaluation is not just a final step, it is a strategic process that maximizes the value of employee development efforts. By measuring training outcomes effectively, organisations can identify areas for improvement, reinforce employee growth, and ensure a high return on their investment in learning.

Whether through models like Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels or the Phillips ROI approach, or simple pre- and post-assessments, businesses of all sizes can benefit from structured evaluations. As demonstrated by the examples, post-training evaluation isn’t just about tracking results – it is about fostering a culture of continuous learning and development. In today’s competitive environment, leveraging post-training evaluation is essential for organisations committed to growth, excellence, and sustainable success.

Please leave a comment.

Contributed by Agolo Eugene Uzorka, a Human Resource Consultant and Content Writer.